|
|
|
|
Queen Elizabeth II, monarch of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and The Empire possessions overseas, head of the Commonwealth and Defender of the Faith, by the grace of God head of the Church of England, and other titles bestowed upon your majesty. Is your majesty content to see, during your reign - long may it last - the dissolution of Christianity in your kingdom? It would be presumptuous of me to recount what is happening in your lands in this regard. I will take it as read that Your Majesty is cognizant of the pronouncement and dicta of His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury on matters pertaining to Islam. To have led the country to accept Sharia as part of your judiciary system and to claim now that the heritage of the United Kingdom in not only Judeo-Christian but also Islamic is an unholy travesty, grievous enough, that out of sheer decency he must resign his ecumenical post. Alas, the once shining beacon of Christianity to the entire world has dimmed and is flickering to extinction.
I am certain that Your knowledge is very broad and deep enough that Your Majesty is aware that the Crusades have weakened the Eastern Orthodox during their bid to claim the Holy Land from the infidels. The Eastern Church, to which I belong as a Copt, though beleaguered and challenged as much as it had been throughout the ages, will survive and the Cross will be lifted high where it was once lifted before for our salvation.
This missive is a plea. Your Majesty is not without influence in Your lands and beyond. You are the most admired and respected person in the world. This is a heavy burden on your shoulders. As the standard bearer for Christ the King You must lead Your nation, Europe, Australia, America to reclaim the depleting Western Civilization which is based on the Love of God through the sacrifice of His Son. When You right the course of Your ship others will take heart and follow. The Eastern Church will be emboldened to carry out its battles against the enemies of our God.
The Copts have fought the good fight and continue to do so despite the lack of succor from without. We do not ask for help from without. We will hold our own what’re betide, but Your role in this historic moment of the clash between the forces of evil and the forces of good will cover our flank and gain us victory, which our faith deserves.
|
We encourage you to submit both supporting and critical viewpoints. However, any inappropriate responses will not be posted.
|
|
|
|
Islam again and again
|
2010-07-25 23:48:52 / 34241 |
Dear Dr. Saba,
I was very interested reading this article, as I have been wondering since I came from the USA about the massive number of Muslims over there whom are consistently trying to change every law to go by their Shari'a and crying out for their rights! So what came to my mind three things 1- The USA are trying to show the whole world how open they are 2- They benefit from the money/petrol of the Muslims 3- They think that Muslims have no plan and that they can be controlled easily at any point ! (This also applies all over Europe) what these countries should really consider is the numbers of Muslim immigrants going to their countries on yearly basis; I have seen a whole city in the USA that had only mosques, valid women and Imam's! So what we can conclude that these people are working like the Muslims brotherhood in Egypt, they are organized, they work in groups, they have loads of money and they have a MISSION to accomplish!
Last, I hope we can stop the vicious invasion that wants to bring all the so-called "Christian" countries into Islam!
Salma
|
|
|
2010-07-26 07:14:32 / 34260 |
This author seems to have no respect for the separation of religion and state if he believes the Queen - who is merely the ceremonial head of state - should be responsible for maintaining Christianity in her country and elsewhere. This article also shows some ignorance of the Christian history of England as it completely ignores the split by King Henry from Catholicism to Protestant, the subsequent wars in Ireland, ect. and glosses over such history by simply saying GB is a 'Christian country.'
Also, the author offers no proof of how the Queen was responsible for leading her country into allowing Sharia law.....not to mention she's not a Parliamentarian, so if anyone led the country into different laws it would be the Prime Minister and certainly not the Queen.
With that said, all of us members and readers of CAA should support and encourage the heads of state and politicians all around the world who speak out against injustice and on behalf of people, like the Copts, who are being severely persecuted. This, I think, is the overall point of this article - which I agree with - although the supporting facts are extremely weak and poorly explained.
Anonymous
|
|
GOD IS JUST & FAIR
|
2010-07-26 22:49:52 / 34280 |
SABRA DEMIAN GOD BLESS YOU & NOT REPEAT NOT THE QUEEN AS SHE INTENTIONALLY DENOUNCES GOD W HER CHILDREN & GRAND CHILDREN GOD WILL DENOUNCE HER AS HE IS A FAIR & JUST GOD.
HER TIGHT LIPS on the mokeries of the archbishop of canterbury is a blasphemy in itself
NABIL MAGAR,DDS.
|
|
|
2010-07-28 05:54:39 / 34319 |
Sir/Madam
There must be a strong reason why someone writes anonymously, which could be non-salutary. I have written repeatedly of the importance of religion and state, which is not observed in many Muslim countries, including Egypt. To ignore the fact that there is an influence of a religion on the basic laws of a country is a poor understanding of the premise. The commentator does not understand what a constitutional monarchy is. He is probably unaware of the fact that the prime minister meets with Her Majesty once a week to provide information and receive consultation from the queen. It seems that he/she are unaware of the fact that Her Majesty can dissolve the parliament if she disagrees with a major issue the parliament passed and sent to the Lords, such as annexing a religious source, El Shari' a to the common law of her land. The head of the Anglican Church of England is Her Majesty and not His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury. He is her subordinate, and as such, while he is free to express His opinions, he is yet answerable to the queen. I was educated in an English School in Cairo, worshipped at Anglican churches, practiced medicine in England and am a student of the history and culture of the UK. I believe that the negative comments are due to lack of understanding of the facts and a misunderstanding of the thrust of what I wrote.
Saba E. Demian, M.D., FACP. MASCP, MASH
Dr. Saba Demian
|
|
The views and opinions of authors whose articles and comments are posted on this site
do not necessarily reflect the views of CAA.
|
|
